2011/12/25 Magnus Therning
<magnus@therning.org>
I don't think that [haskell] move to a version of GHC that is newer
than what's in [extra]. This means that in order to avoid doing
unnecessary work you need to ask Vesa what his GHC plans are. In a
thread from earlier in the autumn he did express some plans, but I
suspect you are already aware of that thread.
I would like Vesa to take part to this discussion... In that thread he planned to drop haskell-platform (and I fully agree) but talked about moving those packages to [community]. IMHO the most useful thing to do is putting all haskell packages in [haskell], this is the easiest way to track dependencies with cblrepo.
> Witch version should I use? For now we have 1 vote for 7.2.2
> (Magnus) and 1 for 7.0.4 (Bernardo).
I suspect the most worthwhile thing to do is an attempt to use 7.4rc1.
I used 7.2.2 from [testing]. I suspect that a lot of package will not compile with 7.4...
I invented the term Object-Oriented, and I can tell you I did not have
C++ in mind.
-- Alan Kay
_______________________________________________
arch-haskell mailing list
arch-haskell@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/arch-haskell