On Sun, May 3, 2015 at 2:07 PM Stanislaw Findeisen <stf.list.haskell@eisenbits.com> wrote:

On 2015-04-28 12:15, Alexey Shmalko wrote:
> I'm sorry, my example should've been:
>
> [1,2,3] >>= \a -> [a+1] >>= \a -> return a

Or just:

[1,2,3] >>= (return . (+1))

Or just:

[2,3,4]

The point of the example was to desugar original do notation and show there are two `a`s involved.