I've just started learning Haskell and I've been wondering about this issue as well. I can usually work out a point-free version by carefullty deriving it step-by-step, but I was wondering if Haskell had composition operators/functions for dealing with the various forms of composition where a 2-arg function is involved.

I've played around with J (APL's successor) a little and noticed that J has various options for composing two functions (Ponit-free, or "implicit" style is very important in J). Some of the distinctions have to do with J's  native array operations and aren't relevant here, but many are. Here are Haskell versions...
(note: "monadic" below isn't used in the Haskell/CT sense - "monadic" and "dyadic" in J jsut refer to how many arguments an operator acts on)

-- hook is the J dyadic hook as a function.
hook :: (a->b->c) -> (d->b) -> a -> d -> c
hook f g = \x y -> f x (g y)
-- J's monadic hook
mhook :: (a->b->c) -> (a->b) -> a -> c
mhook f g = \x -> (hook f g) x x
-- J's monadic fork
fork :: (a->b->c) -> (d->a) -> (d->b) -> d  -> c
fork f g h = \x -> f (g x) (h x)
-- J's dyadic fork
dyfork :: (a->b->c) -> (d->e->a) -> (d->e->b) -> d -> e -> c
dyfork f g h = \x y -> f (g x y) (h x y)
-- J's dyadic @ or @: - composition of 1-arg fn with 2-arg fn
compose12 :: (a->b) -> (c->d->a) -> c -> d -> b
compose12 f g = \x y -> f (g x y)
(@:) = compose12
{-  J's dyadic & or &: - composition of 2-arg fn with 1-arg fn, resulting in a
  2-arg fn (f&:g) which applies g to *both* args before passing them to f.
  Haskell's composition operator and partial application allow a composition
  of such fns (f . g) where g is applied only to the first arg.    -}
compose21 :: (a->a->b) -> (c->a) -> c -> c -> b
compose21 f g = \x y -> f (g x) (g y)
(&:) = compose21


/ /I know a lot of Haskell is written in point-free style and I would have thought Haskell would have operators for some of this, but judging from the previous responses, it looks like it might not. That surprises me, since some of this seems to crop up a lot, but as I said I've just started learning Haskell, so I guess I'll have to give myself some time to absorb the Haskell way of doing things.