Hello,

I am trying to define a logical calculus using one data type for the rules. There are three types of rules and each has 0,1 or 2 assumptions (rule, rule1 and rule2 below). I have defined all the rules as different constructors so the difference between the types according to 0,1 or 2 assumptions is very weak. I would still like to be able to group the rules in types according to the number of assumptions in order to use pattern matching. Is there a simple way to do that or another way I should implement the data type such that I can refer to the rules both according to their number of assumptions and according to their type?

  27 data Rule = Axiom {lowseq :: Sequent}
  28         | WeakeningL {rule :: Rule, lowseq :: Sequent, foccur :: FormulaOccur}
  29         | WeakeningR {rule :: Rule, lowseq :: Sequent, foccur :: FormulaOccur}
  30         | ContractionL {rule :: Rule, lowseq :: Sequent, foccur :: FormulaOccur}
  31         | ContractionR {rule :: Rule, lowseq :: Sequent, foccur :: FormulaOccur}
  32         | PermutationL {rule :: Rule, lowseq :: Sequent}
  33         | PermutationR {rule :: Rule, lowseq :: Sequent}
  34         | Mix {rule1 :: Rule, rule2 :: Rule, lowseq :: Sequent, foccur :: FormulaOccur}
  35         | NotL {rule :: Rule, lowseq :: Sequent, foccur :: FormulaOccur}
  36         | NotR {rule :: Rule, lowseq :: Sequent, foccur :: FormulaOccur}
  37         | AndL {rule1 :: Rule, rule2 :: Rule, lowseq :: Sequent, foccur :: FormulaOccur}
  38         | AndR {rule1 :: Rule, rule2 :: Rule, lowseq :: Sequent, foccur :: FormulaOccur}
  39         deriving (Eq, Show)

Thanks,
Tomer