On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 09:37, Luca Ciciriello <luca_ciciriello@hotmail.com> wrote:
Is it possible to use the pattern (x:xs) using a parallel array [::]?

If it's there at all, I would expect the syntax to be as (:) is to [,]:  (:x:xs:).  That said, normal arrays have no such syntax, so parallel arrays may not either.  (Then again, normal arrays don't even have an equivalent of [: :]; you have to marshal/demarshal from a list.)

--
brandon s allbery                                      allbery.b@gmail.com
wandering unix systems administrator (available)     (412) 475-9364 vm/sms