You can be cute and use the applicative instance on functions: (&&) <$> pred1 <*> pred2. I would recommend against such cuteness however and just write out the arguments.

On Mon, 16 Nov 2015 at 11:54 emacstheviking <objitsu@gmail.com> wrote:
I guess it depends on the final use cases... you could use currying to partially evaluate some stuff ready, locked and loaded as it were but the example you have  given shows to distinct functions pres1 and pred2.

I guess the short answer is "yes" but it depends on how you do it!

:)
Sean


On 16 November 2015 at 11:44, Mark Carter <alt.mcarter@gmail.com> wrote:
Suppose I want to use an argument twice, as for example in the expression:
(\x -> (pred1 x) and (pred2 x))

Is there a shorter way of doing this?
_______________________________________________
Beginners mailing list
Beginners@haskell.org
http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/beginners

_______________________________________________
Beginners mailing list
Beginners@haskell.org
http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/beginners