Actually I have one question that what's the reason it has 'special' (a better word?) style at programming CSS and JavaScripts?

Seems like no other frameworks doing that? (Correct me if I am wrong)

Thanks.
-Simon

On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 9:38 PM, Christopher Done <chrisdone@googlemail.com> wrote:

On 17 June 2011 14:53, Michael Snoyman <michael@snoyman.com> wrote:
I'm not saying Happstack or Snap are bad frameworks, quite the
opposite. But I don't think these generic "X isn't mature" or "Y has
bad documentation" do much to help newcomers become acclimated.

I'll back this up, Yesod has quite an extensive book with tips and tricks including corner cases and such: http://www.yesodweb.com/book

I'd like to respectfully disagree with this assessment. I'm not quite
sure what you mean by "mature", but Yesod has been developed actively
for two years, has the vast majority of features you'll need on a
project, is in use by many production settings and has the highest
performance figures of any of the big three frameworks.

FWIW I think he means the API changes, not that the software itself is runtime-stable. The "developed actively" may imply a changing API. I don't know whether this is true, but I think that's what he meant.

Anyway, I doubt maturity as in runtime stability matters that much to newbies.

_______________________________________________
Beginners mailing list
Beginners@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/beginners