Roland, in this case using the strict version of foldl' would give you better performance, but to really reach C speed equivalence, I would check out the vector package and read the stream fusion article.

Here is an example that fits your scenario:

https://gist.github.com/dmjio/6166076


On Sun, Oct 6, 2013 at 6:38 AM, Roland Leißa <leissa@cs.uni-saarland.de> wrote:
Hi all,

for a benchmark I'd like to write code like this:
    foldl (+) [0 100000000]

how do I get the best performance out of it? However, It is important for me
to rely on a higher-order function. Is it possible to be en par with the C
version?
    int64_t result = 0;
    for (int64_t i = 0; i <= 100000000; ++i)
        result += i;

Many thanks in advance for helping out,
Roland

_______________________________________________
Beginners mailing list
Beginners@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/beginners



--
Cell: 1.630.740.8204