fmap . fmap is close to applicative ? 

is it possible to do applicative instead of combining 2 fmaps ? 

Thanks

On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 12:29 AM, Tony Morris <tonymorris@gmail.com> wrote:
Michael P Mossey wrote:
> How does one write
>
> fmap (fmap (*2)) xs
>
> without parenthesis? (Using . and $ instead.)
>
> I don't really understand . and $ well enough I guess. I tried a bunch
> of stuff but nothing worked.
>
> -Mike
> _______________________________________________
> Beginners mailing list
> Beginners@haskell.org
> http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/beginners
>
fmap . fmap $ (*2)

or perhaps:

(fmap . fmap) (*2)

--
Tony Morris
http://tmorris.net/


_______________________________________________
Beginners mailing list
Beginners@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/beginners



--
Federico Brubacher
www.fbrubacher.com

Colonial Duty Free Shop
www.colonial.com.uy