That's great, thanks.
Matt
At 11:53 26/11/2015, you wrote:
On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 6:20 PM,
MJ Williams
<
matthewjwilliams101@gmail.com> wrote:
- therefore f ( g a ) = g ( f a ) . (transitivity)
If you're interested in getting a firm grasp of airtight proofs -- with a
view toward Haskell (and Agda and Idris) mastery -- you might want to
pick and choose your way through the web-based proof exercises
here:
https://www.coursera.org/course/intrologic
This is a course firmly in the American analytic philosophy tradition, so
Logic here is Symbolic Logic. Bonus: the course keeps AI and Machine
Learning applications in the backdrop.
It's unfortunate that it's some kind of well-kept secret.
Those who don't need it -- because they've obtained the knowledge
elsewhere -- won't know about it. And those who do want that knowledge
also won't know about it.
Did I mention the exercises are web-based? Yes, you get instantaneous
feedback on whether you've got a correct proof or not.
-- Kim-Ee
_______________________________________________
Beginners mailing list
Beginners@haskell.org
http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/beginners