Emacs can be configured to look great, see the following quora answer for example. You can just try to get used to it and
add your configuration incremently. After a few time, it will be of beautiful appearance.
http://www.quora.com/How-can-I-go-from-good-to-great-in-Emacs
I did try to use Leksah, but did not like the interface. I don't
think it helped with debugging, but may be mistaken. I'm now using
sublime 3 and hoping that someday I will be able to use Atom. Emacs
appears to be the standard, but it is just too ugly for me.
Dimitri
On 09/04/15 02:03, emacstheviking
wrote:
That's interesting.
I must confess that I find the need to debug in Haskell
greatly reduced because I tend to design stuff in small
incremental steps in ghci / emac in a Lisp like way which
means that I am reasoning out my code as I write it which
usually means there are no logical bugs at least.
However I can see the need on occasion to maybe debug into
issues relating to threads / STM and behaviours between
processes in general.
Have you tried using Leksah, the Haskell IDE?
_______________________________________________
Beginners mailing listBeginners@haskell.orghttp://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/beginners