Sounds good to me. 

On Wednesday, 15 April 2015, Luite Stegeman <stegeman@gmail.com> wrote:
I think that would be ok. But I'd like to get the version number of the 1.22 branch bumped and update the Cabal submodule in GHC so I can run more tests as early as possible and perhaps avoid more embarassing bugs like this.

Would it be ok if I bumped the 1.22 branch (to 1.22.3.0 ?). Then when you roll the release we can just update the submodule again.

luite


On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 3:18 PM, Ryan Thomas <ryan@ryant.org> wrote:
Hey Luite,

I can do one but unfortunately I'm in Vietnam without any of my keys until Sunday. If it can wait until then I would be happy to do it when I return home. 

Cheers,

Ryan


On Wednesday, 15 April 2015, Luite Stegeman <stegeman@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi all,

Unfortunately GHC 7.10.1 shipped with a Cabal library that handles ghcjs-pkg version numbers wrong, making it unusable to boot GHCJS.

I'd like 7.10.2 to ship with a working version (7.10.2 itself also contains an important bugfix for GHCJS), which would require a new minor version release. Can we do one soon? Let me know if I can do anything to help!

luite