As an aside some people (Joey Adams IIRC, maybe others) have suggested that postgresql-simple should change the conversions so that ByteString represents postgresql's binary blobs,  and not postgresql's text.   (And get rid of the Binary type in the process)

This seems a perfectly reasonable suggestion to me,  though I'm not particularly inclined to change the API either.   If you'd like to adopt this suggestion,  be my guest.

I don't think that API compatibility between the *-simples should be high priority;   do whatever you think is best for sqlite-simple.   Then hopefully in a few years we'll have some well-developed database-specific interfaces that can inform a next-generation HDBC interface.

Best,
Leon

On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 10:33 AM, Bryan O'Sullivan <bos@serpentine.com> wrote:
On Sun, Aug 12, 2012 at 11:18 AM, Janne Hellsten <jjhellst@gmail.com> wrote:
I note that postgresql-simple and mysql-simple use ByteStrings
exclusively in the API.

No, that's not how they work. The underlying representation in some places might be a ByteString, but the actual APIs don't use ByteStrings, they go through typeclasses.

http://hackage.haskell.org/packages/archive/mysql-simple/latest/doc/html/Database-MySQL-Simple-Param.html

_______________________________________________
database-devel mailing list
database-devel@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/database-devel