Thanks for the reference to November 18, 1883. That was an interesting read!

I agree with your analysis of the situation with types. If this results in the need for breaking changes to persistent-postgresql, so be it. I'd rather have correctness than false stability.

I looked at the code a bit, it looks good to me.

On Jun 2, 2012 8:40 PM, "Leon Smith" <leon.p.smith@gmail.com> wrote: