I personally consider this to be most reasonable. But maybe I oversee something…
--
Best, Artem
Aha. I had just jumped to the chase.But is there a reason we don't just point everyone (including newcomers) to git://git.haskell.org/ghc.git ? That's what I always use myself, and it seems simpler to do so.Richard_______________________________________________On Jul 17, 2018, at 3:14 PM, Matthew Pickering <matthewtpickering@gmail.com> wrote:Did you do the line above as well?
```
git config --global url."git://github.com/ghc/packages-".insteadOf
git://github.com/ghc/packages/
```
On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 8:09 PM, Richard Eisenberg <rae@cs.brynmawr.edu> wrote:Hi devs,
The Newcomers page (https://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/wiki/Newcomers) recommends cloning GHC withgit clone --recursive git://github.com/ghc/ghc
I believe my students did this with success several weeks ago. But trying it again today leads to trouble with some submodules, e.g.:Cloning into '/Users/rae/ltemp/ghc-test/libraries/Cabal'...
fatal: remote error:
ghc/packages/Cabal is not a valid repository name
Email support@github.com for help
fatal: clone of 'git://github.com/ghc/packages/Cabal.git' into submodule path '/Users/rae/ltemp/ghc-test/libraries/Cabal' failed
Is there something wrong in the internets? Or should we update the Newcomers page?
Thanks,
Richard
_______________________________________________
ghc-devs mailing list
ghc-devs@haskell.org
http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs
ghc-devs mailing list
ghc-devs@haskell.org
http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs