On Sun, Jul 5, 2015 at 3:27 PM, Bardur Arantsson <spam@scientician.net> wrote:
Further, I don't think the aeson DDoS problem was predicated on an
old/obsolete "base" library? Maybe I'm wrong about that, and I'm sure
y'all will be happy to point out where and why. :)

I may be misremembering, but I thought one of the complaints about aeson adding scientific to its dependencies (to fix the DDoS) was that it required a newer ghc?

--
brandon s allbery kf8nh                               sine nomine associates
allbery.b@gmail.com                                  ballbery@sinenomine.net
unix, openafs, kerberos, infrastructure, xmonad        http://sinenomine.net