On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 12:43 PM, Vincent Hanquez <tab@snarc.org> wrote:
there's (probably) lots of small/janitorial
contributions that do not need the full power of phabricator or any
sophisticated code review.
Austin's point, and I agree, is that we shouldn't optimize the system for those contributions. Cleanup, documentation and other small patches are very much welcomed, and they usually get merged within a few days. To make a truly better GHC though, we very much depend on expert contributors, say to implement and review Backpack or DWARF-based backtraces. My point is that `arc` is hurting these expert contributors as much, if not more than everyone else. To get more expert contributors you need more newcomers, but don't optimize the system only for the newcomers.