Do we get some benchmarks -- 32x better req/sec would be a good smackdown of some recent posts floating around.<div><br></div><div><a href="http://techblog.safaribooksonline.com/2013/02/22/go-as-an-alternative-to-node-js-for-very-fast-servers/">http://techblog.safaribooksonline.com/2013/02/22/go-as-an-alternative-to-node-js-for-very-fast-servers/</a></div>
<div><br></div><div>etc etc.<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 7:02 AM, Johan Tibell <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="mailto:johan.tibell@gmail.com" target="_blank">johan.tibell@gmail.com</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Hi,<div><br></div><div>I&#39;ve merged the new parallel I/O manager that Andreas Voellmy and Kazu Yamamoto have been working on. The new parallel I/O manager scales much better than the current one*: the number of requests per second scales almost linearly up to 32 cores I believe. Perhaps Andreas could post the numbers.</div>


<div><br></div><div>If you see any bugs that you think are related to the new I/O manager, please let Andreas and Kazu know.</div><div><br></div><div>* The current one (which replaced an even earlier one) scaled well in the number of open file descriptors and performed better than the I/O manager it replaced, but it didn&#39;t scale well to multiple cores.</div>


<div><br></div><div>Cheers,</div><div>Johan</div><div><br></div>
<br>_______________________________________________<br>
ghc-devs mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:ghc-devs@haskell.org">ghc-devs@haskell.org</a><br>
<a href="http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs" target="_blank">http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br></div>