I see this as mission-critical to relieving Cabal hell.  (Am I alone?)  So it’s great that Vishal is going to work on it.  Go Vishal!

Can I take it, then, that the Cabal developers will be sufficiently involved that, assuming there are no show-stopping problems, they’ll accept the patch?

It is tantalising to me that something so critical has been so long delayed.   It’d be fantastic if it was done this summer.

Simon

From: Gershom B [mailto:gershomb@gmail.com]
Sent: 07 May 2015 22:29
To: Mikhail Glushenkov
Cc: Simon Peyton Jones; haskell-infrastructure@community.galois.com; cabal-devel@haskell.org; Haskell Libraries; ghc-devs@haskell.org
Subject: Re: Cabal and simultaneous installations of the same package

For the info of all, here is the proposal: https://gist.github.com/fugyk/37510958b52589737274

The mentors are Ryan Trinkle and Thomas Tuegel. Hopefully as the project proceeds, Vishal will be checking in with us, asking questions and seeking clarification where necessary, etc.

--Gershom

On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 5:19 PM, Mikhail Glushenkov <the.dead.shall.rise@gmail.com> wrote:

On 7 May 2015 at 22:34, Simon Peyton Jones <simonpj@microsoft.com> wrote:
> Dear Cabal developers
>
> I guess everyone is busy, but I feel a bit stuck on knowing how to make
> progress on this thread.

Vishal Agrawal's GSoC proposal has been accepted. I guess we'll have
to wait and see what comes out of it now.

_______________________________________________
cabal-devel mailing list
cabal-devel@haskell.org
http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cabal-devel