Given the prevalence of spellings like "normalise" in common Haskell packages, we might just be settling on British English. Being American makes that a tad difficult on my end, but personally I can make peace with it.

On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 3:19 PM, Matthew Pickering <matthewtpickering@gmail.com> wrote:

I also like 'bespoke' but then it seems to be a much more common in
British English than American English.

On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 7:46 PM, Ryan Scott <ryan.gl.scott@gmail.com> wrote:
> Bardur,
>
> Since you don't like "bespoke", would you mind suggesting an
> alternative, or advocating for a previously mentioned idea? From [1],
> the ideas I've seen tossed around are:
>
> * builtin
> * standard (Elliot Cameron suggested it here [2])
> * wiredin (Cater Schonwald suggested it here [3])
> * magic (Andres Löh suggested it here [4])
> * native
> * original
> * specialized (the above three are ad hoc suggestions I came up with in a hurry)
>
> Ryan S.
> -----
> [1] https://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/wiki/Commentary/Compiler/DerivingStrategies#Alternativesyntax
> [2] https://mail.haskell.org/pipermail/ghc-devs/2016-July/012448.html
> [3] https://mail.haskell.org/pipermail/ghc-devs/2016-July/012450.html
> [4] https://mail.haskell.org/pipermail/ghc-devs/2016-July/012453.html
> _______________________________________________
> ghc-devs mailing list
> ghc-devs@haskell.org
> http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs
_______________________________________________
ghc-devs mailing list
ghc-devs@haskell.org
http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs

_______________________________________________
ghc-devs mailing list
ghc-devs@haskell.org
http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs