Hi Ben, Joachim,
> Nope, that's exactly right. Unfortunately, even "trivial" fixes have a
> tendency to break the tree (which has been happening too often recently)
> so I'm trying to push contributors to use CI whenever possible.
Thank you for explaining me.
I understand the reason that you are talking about travis.
> I see. The term “flow” suggested something deeper or more structured
> (which might be good, but is not the case). Maybe relabel it “direct
> commit”.
Thank you.
I'll update the "committer flow" to "direct commit" on page 7.
It is more clear about the current situation.
Regards,
Takenobu