That's certainly a possibility, though note that this is only an issue for compiling stage2, not end user programs.
Since it's only for compiling ghc we don't have to include it in the bindist so license would be less of an issue I think.

I'll modify the scripts to pull it automatically when I submit the rest of the patches.

Thanks,
Tamar

On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 3:25 PM Ara Adkins <me@ara.io> wrote:
With a hit like that I think it should at least be highly publicised that it can cause huge hits to compilation time. I would support bundling the executable if it has a compatible license. 

_ara

On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 3:19 PM, Ryan Scott <ryan.gl.scott@gmail.com> wrote:
Thanks for putting so much effort into this work, Tamar!

> When I do turn it on, by default you will get a large ~45min hit in compile time.

Yikes, that's really bad! Bad enough that I have to wonder: would it
be worth including genlib among the other executables that we bundle
with GHC? Fortunately, us GHC developers have the foresight to know
that we should install genlib, but I imagine less informed Windows
users probably won't get the memo and will start to wonder why
compilation became so slow all of a sudden.

Ryan S.
_______________________________________________
ghc-devs mailing list
ghc-devs@haskell.org
http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs

_______________________________________________
ghc-devs mailing list
ghc-devs@haskell.org
http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs