> Having a 'single source of truth' database will help with this.
Don't hesitate to make a PR to
https://gitlab.haskell.org/haskell/ghc-api-compat so that at least
the DB and the .cabal files live in the same repo.
I have created this package but I don't use it so anyone should really feel free to take it over.
Sylvain
AF
---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Ari Fordsham <arifordsham@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 8 Aug 2021 at 16:43
Subject: Re: GHC Module change database
To: Vaibhav Sagar <vaibhavsagar@gmail.com>
That's where I generated it from :-)
It would be nice to generate that from the new database.
My main motivation was as follows: There are two possible paradigms for GHC API compatibility:
- Export old names for new modules - as in ghc-api-compatThis allows existing code to (kind of) 'just work' - but it doesn't help in managing that code as it gets extended to use new features
- Export new names to old modulesI am thinking of working on a tool that does this.You need to rewrite code to use current modules (maybe https://github.com/facebookincubator/retrie/issues/33 will help), but then you can just target the latest API, and have compatibility built in.This seems to me better for active codebases.
Having a 'single source of truth' database will help with this.AF
On Sun, 8 Aug 2021 at 16:36, Vaibhav Sagar <vaibhavsagar@gmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, Aug 9, 2021 at 1:34 AM Ari Fordsham <arifordsham@gmail.com> wrote:
_______________________________________________I've made a database of GHC API module changes.
This might be useful for automatic tooling.
It would be nice if this would be moved into the GHC Gitlab, and kept up-to-date.
Ari Fordsham
ghc-devs mailing list
ghc-devs@haskell.org
http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs
_______________________________________________ ghc-devs mailing list ghc-devs@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs