Fusion is more useful in a strict setting - it makes strict pipelines compositional in performance.<span></span><br><br>On Thursday, 2 May 2013, Johan Tibell  wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div dir="ltr"><div>All good questions!</div><div><br></div>On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 12:48 PM, Carter Schonwald <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="javascript:_e({}, &#39;cvml&#39;, &#39;carter.schonwald@gmail.com&#39;);" target="_blank">carter.schonwald@gmail.com</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br>


<div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><div>What changes in the semantics  of doing fusion optimization?</div>


</div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>I think Duncan said that fusion is quite separate from the strictness/laziness in the language.</div><div><br></div></div></div></div>
</blockquote>