I'm not sure what the criteria are either, but I guess DeriveAnyClass is comparable to the other extensions mentioned.


Cheers,
Pedro


On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 10:07 AM, Simon Peyton Jones <simonpj@microsoft.com> wrote:
|  ...which of the following language extensions (which are mentioned in
|  T4437) are deemed stable enough to be registered in Cabal for GHC
|  7.10?

I'm not sure what criteria you'd like to use!

PatternSynonyms, PartialTypeSignatures, and NamedWildCards are all pretty stable and should go in.

StaticPointers will definitely continue to be there in future; but the details of the API may change, and the current implementation is very much a prototype.

DeriveAnyClass: I defer to Pedro

Simon

|  -----Original Message-----
|  From: Herbert Valerio Riedel [mailto:hvriedel@gmail.com]
|  Sent: 18 December 2014 22:14
|  To: Simon Peyton Jones
|  Cc: Johan Tibell; Austin Seipp; Duncan Coutts
|  Subject: Which language extensions to register for Cabal 1.22?
|
|  Hello Simon,
|
|  ...which of the following language extensions (which are mentioned in
|  T4437) are deemed stable enough to be registered in Cabal for GHC
|  7.10?
|
|   - "DeriveAnyClass"
|   - "PatternSynonyms"
|   - "PartialTypeSignatures"
|   - "NamedWildcards"
|   - "StaticPointers"
|
|  Cheers,
|    hvr
_______________________________________________
ghc-devs mailing list
ghc-devs@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs