Manuel
Can you comment on this? You’ve argued for keeping the vectorisation code in, but is this particular data constructor in VectDecl used?
Simon
From: ghc-devs <ghc-devs-bounces@haskell.org>
On Behalf Of Alan & Kim Zimmerman
Sent: 20 April 2018 14:21
To: ghc-devs <ghc-devs@haskell.org>
Subject: HsVectInstIn is dead code?
If I grep through the GHC source, or do a github search[1]
It seems that HsVectInst exists, and can be renamed, typechecked, zonked, desugared.
But it does not get parse, and does not appear to be introduced in any other way.
Am I missing something? Should it be deleted (as hinted at in one of the comments?)