I’m afraid I didn’t understand the issue in the link below.  It speaks of “querying the type”, but I’m not sure what that means.  A GHCi session perhaps?  Does this relate to the way GHCi displays types?

 

I’m a bit lost.  A from-the-beginning example, showing steps and what the unexpected behaviour is would be helpful (to me anyway)

 

Simon

 

From: ghc-devs [mailto:ghc-devs-bounces@haskell.org] On Behalf Of Christopher Done
Sent: 19 October 2016 12:46
To: ghc-devs@haskell.org
Subject: How to best display type variables with the same name

 

We've encountered a problem in Intero which is that when inspecting types of expressions and patterns, sometimes it happens that the type, when pretty printing, yields variables of the same name but which have different provenance.

 

Here's a summary of the issue:

 

https://github.com/commercialhaskell/intero/issues/280#issuecomment-254784904

 

And a strawman proposal of how it could be solved:

 

https://github.com/commercialhaskell/intero/issues/280#issuecomment-254787927

 

What do you think? 

 

Also, if I were to implement the strawman proposal, is it possible to recover from a `tyvar :: Type` its original quantification/its "forall"? I've had a look through the API briefly and it looks like a _maybe_.

 

Ciao!