We should make sure that someone that understands this issue talks to them ASAP.


On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 2:51 PM, Carter Schonwald <carter.schonwald@gmail.com> wrote:
yup! its exciting. 

we were talking about this a bit earlier today on #haskell-llvm, and it sounds doable. 
There were some concerns that folks had, but hopefully we can give the llvm devs feedback about this before its finalized in LLVM 3.4 so it doesn't come with any performance caveats for ghc.





On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 5:14 PM, Gabor Greif <ggreif@gmail.com> wrote:
This looks pretty exiting for LLVM IR-generation:

http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20130909/188042.html

GHC 7.10 might generate LLVM IR including embedded tables without
resorting to linker tricks/postprocessing when targeting LLVM 3.4!

The relevant LLVM bug is http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=14080

and GHC Trac: http://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/4213

Cheers,

    Gabor
_______________________________________________
ghc-devs mailing list
ghc-devs@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs


_______________________________________________
ghc-devs mailing list
ghc-devs@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs