Let's fix it for the literal 2 :) Nobody worries about overflow of x * x when x and the result are both declared Ints

On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 11:55 AM Joachim Breitner <mail@joachim-breitner.de> wrote:
Hi,

Am Dienstag, den 26.04.2016, 10:33 -0400 schrieb David Feuer:
> Fixing this goes beyond the capabilities of RULES pragmas

maybe it shouln’t:
https://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/9137
https://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/9601


Greetings,
Joachim


--
Joachim “nomeata” Breitner
  mail@joachim-breitner.dehttps://www.joachim-breitner.de/
  XMPP: nomeata@joachim-breitner.de • OpenPGP-Key: 0xF0FBF51F
  Debian Developer: nomeata@debian.org

_______________________________________________
ghc-devs mailing list
ghc-devs@haskell.org
http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs