Thanks, that makes sense.

And the existing behaviour is in the compiler, so the surrounding parens are optional and can/should be stripped (except for Api Annotations)

Alan

On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 10:11 AM, Roman Cheplyaka <roma@ro-che.info> wrote:
On 18/05/15 10:57, Alan & Kim Zimmerman wrote:
> Hi all
>
> I am working on D836 and have the following test case
>
>     data MaybeDefault v where
>         SetTo4 :: forall v a. (( Eq v, Show v ) => v -> MaybeDefault v
> -> a -> MaybeDefault [a])
>
> GHC 7.10.1 regards the return type of SetTo4 as `MaybeDefault [a]`
>
> The question is, due to the parens, is the return type not the whole RHS?
>
> i.e. Similar to how in the signature
>
>     map :: (a -> b) -> [a] -> [b]
>
> the first paramater is a single function.
>
> I am sure I am just confused here.

This is the wrong analogy, since (a -> b) in map's type is in the
negative position.

The correct analogy would be the return type of

  map :: (a -> b) -> ([a] -> [b])

You could argue it both ways. (But only one of them leads to the above
declaration being correct, since the function type is not an instance of
MaybeDefault.)

Roman