I'm happy with this direction, though I don't think we should expect that even capital letters will actually make people notice the text. One small change to suggest, below:_______________________________________________On Feb 23, 2021, at 11:14 AM, Simon Peyton Jones via ghc-devs <ghc-devs@haskell.org> wrote:Proposed new template
PLEASE REPLACE ALL OF THIS TEXT with a description of your merge request, including* A description of what the Merge Request does. For a single-commit MR, a copy of thecommit message is often perfect.* A reference (e.g. #19415) to the ticket that led to this MR, and that describes theproblem that this MR solves. Almost all MRs need a ticket, except the tiniestchanges (e.g. code formatting)- A ticket describes a *problem*- A merge request describes a *solution* to that problem.While you are encouraged to write a good MR Description, it’s not compulsory.You could just be putting up the MR to share with a colleague, for example.But if you want (a) to get code reviews from others, or(b) to land the patch in GHC,please do follow these guidelines.If you are not ready for wide review, please start the MR name with the prefix "WIP:", for "work in progress".Richard
ghc-devs mailing list
ghc-devs@haskell.org
http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs