El lun., 13 jul. 2020 a las 13:58, Richard Eisenberg (<rae@richarde.dev>) escribió:


To summarize where we are in this thread:

I asked:

How should we ensure that various constituencies are well served by our process?

 A. By having shepherds reach out to community members external to the committee who can share their expert opinion
 B. By maintaining a list of constituencies that the committee membership covers (ideally)

I said B
Vitaly said A+B
Joachim said A
Iavor said neither

Do others have opinions?


I lean towards A, but of course not having to see external members and have all stakeholders in the Committee would be great too.

Alejandro