Did you mean to assign me both Eval class and pattern synonym constructors? I’m trying to formulate an evaluation of #42 in isolation from #41 but I don’t think this is what you intended and rather that I should be discussing 41 and 42, not 42 and Eval class.

On Mar 20, 2017, at 6:24 PM, Joachim Breitner <mail@joachim-breitner.de> wrote:

Hi,

this is your secretary speaking:

https://github.com/ghc-proposals/ghc-proposals/pull/27
and
https://github.com/ghc-proposals/ghc-proposals/pull/42
was brought before the committee. The proposals are related, so it
makes sense to decide on them at once.

I propose Chris as the Shepherd. (But this was a relatively arbitrary
decision, and Chris, if you are unhappy with this, I can arbitrary
appoint someone else.)

Chris, please reach consensus as described in
https://github.com/ghc-proposals/ghc-proposals#committee-process

I suggest you make a recommendation about the decision, maybe point out
debatable points, and assume that anyone who stays quiet agrees with
you.

FYI, the oher proposals under discussion at the moment are:

Hex Floats
Shephard: Iavor
https://github.com/ghc-proposals/ghc-proposals/pull/37
Current tendency of the committee: In favor.

INCOMPLETE_CONTEXTS
Shephard: Roman
https://github.com/ghc-proposals/ghc-proposals/pull/34
Current tendency of the committee: Against.

Greetings,
Joachim
--
Joachim “nomeata” Breitner
mail@joachim-breitner.de • https://www.joachim-breitner.de/
XMPP: nomeata@joachim-breitner.de • OpenPGP-Key: 0xF0FBF51F
Debian Developer: nomeata@debian.org