I have now accepted this proposal by completing the steps at https://github.com/ghc-proposals/ghc-proposals/blob/master/acceptance.rst

Thanks all!
Richard

On Apr 13, 2021, at 3:25 PM, Alejandro Serrano Mena <trupill@gmail.com> wrote:

I also agree with acceptance now.

Alejandro

On 12 Apr 2021 at 09:17:38, Joachim Breitner <mail@joachim-breitner.de> wrote:
I concur.

Am Sonntag, den 11.04.2021, 14:27 -0400 schrieb Eric Seidel:
Thanks, I'm happy with the proposal now.

On Wed, Apr 7, 2021, at 14:47, Richard Eisenberg wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> The author of #402 (our own Vladislav) has modified it to remove the
> bit about dropping parentheses. The proposal is now solely about
> liberalizing the existing syntax to allow arbitrary nesting of
> quantifiers in non-record constructors. My recommendation remains to
> accept.
>
> Are there other further thoughts here?
>
> Thanks,
> Richard
> _______________________________________________
> ghc-steering-committee mailing list
> ghc-steering-committee@haskell.org
> https://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-steering-committee
>
_______________________________________________
ghc-steering-committee mailing list
ghc-steering-committee@haskell.org
https://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-steering-committee
--
Joachim Breitner
 mail@joachim-breitner.de
 http://www.joachim-breitner.de/


_______________________________________________
ghc-steering-committee mailing list
ghc-steering-committee@haskell.org
https://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-steering-committee
_______________________________________________
ghc-steering-committee mailing list
ghc-steering-committee@haskell.org
https://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-steering-committee