+1 from me.
The ammendment looks good to me. The semantics stay as previously
intended but are worded more precisely in regards to the report.
Best,
Malte
On 2026-06-07 23:00, Adam Gundry wrote:
> Gergo has now revised the proposed amendment, so please take another look. I
> think it looks good to accept modulo Simon's polishing suggestions.
>
> Adam
>
>
> On 04/10/2024 08:58, Adam Gundry wrote:
> > Dear Committee,
> >
> > Gergő Érdi proposes to amend his import shadowing proposal #652 to
> > clarify the behaviour of module re-exports:
> >
> > https://github.com/ghc-proposals/ghc-proposals/pull/678
> >
> > I'd like to nominate Erik de Castro Lopo as the shepherd, as he
> > shepherded the original proposal.
> >
> > Please guide us to a conclusion as outlined in
> > https://github.com/ghc-proposals/ghc-proposals#committee-process
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Adam
> >
> >
>
> --
> Adam Gundry, Haskell Consultant
> Well-Typed LLP, https://www.well-typed.com/
>
> Registered in England & Wales, OC335890
> 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX, England
>
> _______________________________________________
> ghc-steering-committee mailing list -- ghc-steering-committee@haskell.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to ghc-steering-committee-leave@haskell.org
_______________________________________________
ghc-steering-committee mailing list -- ghc-steering-committee@haskell.org
To unsubscribe send an email to ghc-steering-committee-leave@haskell.org
_______________________________________________
ghc-steering-committee mailing list -- ghc-steering-committee@haskell.org
To unsubscribe send an email to ghc-steering-committee-leave@haskell.org