Can I draw your attention to https://github.com/haskell/core-libraries-committee/issues/325#issuecomment-2796062617 ?

The CLC plan to revisit the proposal, and while continued discussion here is fine, I don't think we could act until the CLC concludes.  My thought: let's move this back to "under revision" rather than shepherd it to a conclusion.

We (maybe Adam or Matthias?) should write to the authors to explain this.  In a sympathetic and supportive way -- I think we all want to see Haskell progress towards beauty and not just keep bad warts; but it's just a tricky one.

Simon

On Fri, 11 Apr 2025 at 08:50, Matthías Páll Gissurarson via ghc-steering-committee <ghc-steering-committee@haskell.org> wrote:
Thank you all! This is a slightly nuanced one, so I’ll write a summary today for us to vote on.

/Matti Palli


On Tue, Apr 8, 2025 at 09:39 Adam Gundry via ghc-steering-committee <ghc-steering-committee@haskell.org> wrote:
Dear Committee,

Benjamin proposes to revive and move forward the Monad of No Return
proposal:

https://github.com/ghc-proposals/ghc-proposals/pull/687
https://github.com/L0neGamer/ghc-proposals/blob/amending-mrp/proposals/0000-amending-mrp.rst

I'd like to nominate Matthías as the shepherd.

Please guide us to a conclusion as outlined in
https://github.com/ghc-proposals/ghc-proposals#committee-process

Cheers,

Adam

--
Adam Gundry, Haskell Consultant
Well-Typed LLP, https://www.well-typed.com/

Registered in England & Wales, OC335890
27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX, England
_______________________________________________
ghc-steering-committee mailing list
ghc-steering-committee@haskell.org
https://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-steering-committee
_______________________________________________
ghc-steering-committee mailing list
ghc-steering-committee@haskell.org
https://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-steering-committee