Dear steering committee -The discussion following my earlier suggestion to reject the proposal has petered out. Taking into account the discussion, it still seems to me that we should reject the proposal, so I've posted on the thread to this effect: https://github.com/ghc-proposals/ghc-proposals/pull/220#issuecomment-531666589Any further comments before we close it?ThanksSimon_______________________________________________On Fri, 5 Jul 2019 at 08:19, Simon Marlow <marlowsd@gmail.com> wrote:Dear steering committee -I am inclined to reject this proposal, so as per the new committee process I posted the rationale on the github thread: https://github.com/ghc-proposals/ghc-proposals/pull/220#issuecomment-508414602You may want to consider the proposal and offer opinions while we wait for the authors' rebuttal. It's a very simple proposal.CheersSimonOn Wed, 3 Jul 2019 at 08:55, Joachim Breitner <mail@joachim-breitner.de> wrote:Dear Committee,
this is your secretary speaking:
QualifiedImports
has been proposed by Arnaud Spiwack and Guillaume Bouchard
https://github.com/ghc-proposals/ghc-proposals/pull/220
https://github.com/tweag/ghc-proposals/blob/qualified-import/proposals/0000-default-qualified-import.rst
I propose Simon M as the shepherd.
Please reach consensus as described in
https://github.com/ghc-proposals/ghc-proposals#committee-process
In particular, talk to the authors before, if you think this should be
rejected, and kick off the discussion on Github, following the steps
described under “Now the shepherd proposes to accept or reject the
proposal” in the above link.
Thanks,
Joachim
--
Joachim Breitner
mail@joachim-breitner.de
http://www.joachim-breitner.de/
_______________________________________________
ghc-steering-committee mailing list
ghc-steering-committee@haskell.org
https://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-steering-committee
ghc-steering-committee mailing list
ghc-steering-committee@haskell.org
https://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-steering-committee