Colleagues
I’m sorry to have been dragging my feet on the records proposal. First there was half term holiday, and then the ICFP deadline, so I’ve been out of action for several weeks.
It’s pretty clear that we are not going to achieve 100% consensus, so the right thing to do is to vote, using the single-transferrable-vote scheme that Joachim runs. It’s worth striving for consensus, because the debate can be clarifying
(and has been!). But I don’t regard non-consensus as a failure. These things are all judgement calls, and people’s judgement can legitimately differ. Voting lets us nevertheless reach a conclusion.
So here’s what I propose
Can you all respond about that, including “Aye” if you think it is both complete and clear.
Please also let me know if you think we should be doing anything else.
Thanks!
Simon