Done! Looking forward to seeing you all!

Alejandro

El dom., 23 ago. 2020 a las 23:08, Richard Eisenberg (<rae@richarde.dev>) escribió:

I've responded to the Doodle -- would be nice to meet up, if possible.

Thanks for organizing, Iavor.

Richard

On Aug 23, 2020, at 12:59 PM, Iavor Diatchki <iavor.diatchki@gmail.com> wrote:

Hello,

I've only heard from Eric, Vitaly, and Simon PJ, could other members of the committee please fill out the Doodle, so we can pick a time?  If none of the times work, please respond with an email, or fill out the Doodle so we can figure out what to do.

-Iavor

On Thu, Aug 20, 2020 at 10:25 AM Vitaly Bragilevsky <bravit111@gmail.com> wrote:

Hi, 

My phone managed to vote twice somehow, but I can't figure out if I can remove one of the lines. 

Vitaly

чт, 20 авг. 2020 г. в 20:02, Iavor Diatchki <iavor.diatchki@gmail.com>:

Hello,

I made a Doodle, please fill it out so we can pick a time that works for everyone:

https://doodle.com/poll/rr6qucs764sb7tfc

-Iavor

On Thu, Aug 20, 2020 at 2:10 AM Simon Peyton Jones <simonpj@microsoft.com> wrote:

Yes – excellent idea Iavor.    Would you feel able to schedule it?

 

Thanks!

 

Simon

 

From: ghc-steering-committee <ghc-steering-committee-bounces@haskell.org> On Behalf Of Iavor Diatchki
Sent: 19 August 2020 18:48
To: ghc-steering-committee <ghc-steering-committee@haskell.org>
Subject: [ghc-steering-committee] Meet during ICFP?

 

Hello,

 

I was wondering if folks would be interested in a quick video chat some time next week?   We have met in person during past ICFPs, and I think it is fun to interact a little more directly with people, even if it happens quite rarely :)   

 

Potential topics to discuss could be:

   * how are things going with the committee---there doesn't seem to be much discussion happening on proposal,

   * I would like to hear more about the Haskell Foundation idea, and I think it might be easier to convey the vision in person, rather than trying to figure it out through the formal documents

   * There is a ticket about potentially defining a GHC2020 multi-extension:  I think that's an interesting idea, but we may want to discuss (1) how do other folks feel about such a thing, (2) what's the most constructive way to make progress on this kind of topic, as there are likely going to be many different opinions on what GHC2020 should be.

 

Thoughts?

-Iavor

 

_______________________________________________
ghc-steering-committee mailing list
ghc-steering-committee@haskell.org
https://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-steering-committee

_______________________________________________
ghc-steering-committee mailing list
ghc-steering-committee@haskell.org
https://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-steering-committee

_______________________________________________
ghc-steering-committee mailing list
ghc-steering-committee@haskell.org
https://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-steering-committee