I think it's reasonable and well thought out. I vote accept.

On Mon, 23 Jun 2025 at 07:55, Sebastian Graf via ghc-steering-committee <ghc-steering-committee@haskell.org> wrote:
Dear Committee,

With their proposal, Teo wants to reduce the maintenance cost for packages (such as `containers`) that depend on `template-haskell` only for comparatively stable APIs (`Lift`, quasiquoting), by carving out separate packages for these stable APIs.
These so-called "type (A) clients" constitute a considerable share of all clients of `template-haskell`. It is a well-written proposal outlining a simple solution with a great cost/benefit ratio.
I recommend we accept it.

Cheers,
Sebastian

Am Mo., 16. Juni 2025 um 09:17 Uhr schrieb Adam Gundry via ghc-steering-committee <ghc-steering-committee@haskell.org>:
Dear Committee,

Teo Camarasu proposes to split out smaller, more coherent packages with
more stable interfaces from the template-haskell package:

https://github.com/ghc-proposals/ghc-proposals/pull/696
https://github.com/TeofilC/ghc-proposals/blob/wip/th-lift-and-quasiquote/proposals/0000-splitting-out-stable-interfaces-from-th.rst

I'd like to nominate Sebastian as the shepherd.

Please guide us to a conclusion as outlined in
https://github.com/ghc-proposals/ghc-proposals#committee-process

Cheers,

Adam


--
Adam Gundry, Haskell Consultant
Well-Typed LLP, https://www.well-typed.com/

Registered in England & Wales, OC335890
27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX, England
_______________________________________________
ghc-steering-committee mailing list
ghc-steering-committee@haskell.org
https://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-steering-committee
_______________________________________________
ghc-steering-committee mailing list
ghc-steering-committee@haskell.org
https://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-steering-committee


--
--  Matthías Páll Gissurarson