This is such a short list :-/ . At this rate, it'll take about 30 years to absorb the current mass of extensions GHC. We absolutely need to be more aggressive there. Either in GHC20XX, or in deprecating extensions. But we're getting nowhere near getting this hydra under control.

On Fri, 5 Jan 2024 at 12:39, Adam Gundry <adam@well-typed.com> wrote:

Thanks Joachim! I'm (unsurprisingly) happy with the result, and I agree
that we should complete the process and go ahead with defining GHC2024
in time for 9.10, even if #628 leads to a bigger shake-up in the future.

Cheers,

Adam

On 05/01/2024 11:00, Joachim Breitner wrote:
> Dear committee,
>
>
> with all votes in (thanks!), the following extensions made quorum to
> form GHC2024:
>
> DataKinds
> DerivingStrategies
> DisambiguateRecordFields
> ExplicitNamespaces
> GADTs (and the implied MonoLocalBinds)
> LambdaCase
> RoleAnnotations
>
> See the full tally in the proposal:
> https://github.com/ghc-proposals/ghc-proposals/blob/joachim/ghc2024/proposals/0000-ghc2024.rst#3tally
>
> Any final thoughts?
>
> Should we hold off accepting that in light of #628 (I don’t hope so).
>
> Cheers,
> Joachim

--
Adam Gundry, Haskell Consultant
Well-Typed LLP, https://www.well-typed.com/

Registered in England & Wales, OC335890
27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX, England

_______________________________________________
ghc-steering-committee mailing list
ghc-steering-committee@haskell.org
https://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-steering-committee