I haven't been pushing this forwards mainly because I don't have the bandwidth myself to work on the implementation, but if someone else is able to do that, that would be great.

There are some details of the spec to iron out.  One is a syntactic decision - whether to use a new keyword "mutable" to indicate mutable fields or not - I'll request comments on the proposal.  There are other details of the spec to iron out related to the implementation, but I think it'll be easier to work through those by starting on a prototype.

Cheers
Simon

On 3 February 2017 at 23:37, Joachim Breitner <mail@joachim-breitner.de> wrote:
Hi,

Am Freitag, den 03.02.2017, 15:29 -0800 schrieb Iavor Diatchki:
> Hello,
>
> I am not sure what's the process for this,

it should be labeled as “under review discussion”, ideally by the
author if the author thinks it is ready for that.



Greetings,
Joachim
--
Joachim “nomeata” Breitner
  mail@joachim-breitner.dehttps://www.joachim-breitner.de/
  XMPP: nomeata@joachim-breitner.de • OpenPGP-Key: 0xF0FBF51F
  Debian Developer: nomeata@debian.org

_______________________________________________
ghc-steering-committee mailing list
ghc-steering-committee@haskell.org
https://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-steering-committee