But PolyKinds does not require TypeInType, according to the docs [https://downloads.haskell.org/ghc/latest/docs/html/users_guide/glasgow_exts.html#extension-PolyKinds] it is in fact the other way around: TypeInType implies PolyKinds. Of course, the fact that kinds and types are unified may leak somehow, but I have a hard time figuring out an example of such.

El jue, 3 dic 2020 a las 18:51, Iavor Diatchki (<iavor.diatchki@gmail.com>) escribió:
I would totally support that if PolyKinds was implemented without requiring TypeInType, but with the current design for me this is a solid `no`.


On Thu, Dec 3, 2020 at 9:48 AM Joachim Breitner <mail@joachim-breitner.de> wrote:
Hi,

Am Donnerstag, den 03.12.2020, 16:40 +0000 schrieb Richard Eisenberg:
> Vote for PolyKinds!

convinced.

Cheers,
Joachim
--
Joachim Breitner
  mail@joachim-breitner.de
  http://www.joachim-breitner.de/


_______________________________________________
ghc-steering-committee mailing list
ghc-steering-committee@haskell.org
https://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-steering-committee
_______________________________________________
ghc-steering-committee mailing list
ghc-steering-committee@haskell.org
https://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-steering-committee