I think this is a fine conclusion to the saga, personally. C2a is one of the more middle-of-the-ground options, and it's refreshing to have an election that chooses such a candidate.

It's been slow, yes, but I think this phase of the saga has highlighted the strengths of the committee process, in that we had a deliberate, carefully reasoned vote.

Thanks for running the vote algorithm, Joachim, and for your careful shepherding, Simon.

Richard

> On Mar 30, 2020, at 5:48 PM, Joachim Breitner <mail@joachim-breitner.de> wrote:
>
> Dear Committe,
>
> thanks all for voting. The ranking of votes is now
>
>      C2a > C2b > C4 > C1 > C7 > C6 > C3 > C5
>
> In particular C2a beats every other options by 7:4 or more, and is
> therefore the result of this poll.
>
> You can see more statistics at
> https://www.condorcet.vote/Vote/AB23CE70AC/
>
> So, does this conclude this saga?
>
> Cheers,
> Joachim
>
> --
> Joachim Breitner
>  mail@joachim-breitner.de
>  http://www.joachim-breitner.de/
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ghc-steering-committee mailing list
> ghc-steering-committee@haskell.org
> https://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-steering-committee

_______________________________________________
ghc-steering-committee mailing list
ghc-steering-committee@haskell.org
https://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-steering-committee