It certainly won’t be easy to build the required consensus, it will almost certainly take time, and we will have to work with other groups with more reach and capacity for this kind of activity.

Does anybody else believe that building consensus around disruptive changes is not something Haskell technical committees should attempt? If so please speak up.

On 3 Sep 2022, at 09:58, Joachim Breitner <mail@joachim-breitner.de> wrote:

So the question is: How can we build wider consensus? What does it even mean?

Is this committee a place to establish consensus? Or reddit? Or a session at Haskell Symposium? Or is consensus something that is structurally not possible to build and recognize?