Agreed.

On 23 February 2018 at 20:32, Richard Eisenberg <rae@cs.brynmawr.edu> wrote:
This proposal (https://github.com/ghc-proposals/ghc-proposals/pull/80) introduces type-level type applications, extending the existing TypeApplications syntax to work in types.

- With -XTypeApplications, you will be able to instantiate kind variables in types. For example, you could talk about `Proxy @(Type -> Type) Maybe` and `Category @(TYPE IntRep) (->)` or even `(->) @(TYPE LiftedRep) @(TYPE DoubleRep)`.

And that's it! GHC *already* has the required/specified/inferred distinction in terms, which is unchanged in types.

I believe strongly we should accept. There was no substantive dissenting commentary, just clarifying questions.

Thanks,
Richard

_______________________________________________
ghc-steering-committee mailing list
ghc-steering-committee@haskell.org
https://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-steering-committee