On 25 May 2017 at 03:15, Joachim Breitner <mail@joachim-breitner.de> wrote:
[Please do not reply to this mail discussing individual proposals.
Instead, reply to the appropriate thread, or start a new one.]

Hi,

just another status update:

We just rejected the instance force proposal.

Open at the moment are:

Eval class
https://github.com/ghc-proposals/ghc-proposals/pull/27
Shepherd: Richard
Status: This came back after being sent to the author for revision.
We are waiting for Richard to make a new decision suggestion.

UNPACK on function arguments
https://github.com/ghc-proposals/ghc-proposals/pull/46
Shepherd: Simon Marlow
Status: Awaiting a recommendation from Simon


I did make a recommendation, but that prompted further discussion on github.  Should we put the proposal back in the discussion state?

Cheers
Simon
 

Greetings,
Joachim

--
Joachim “nomeata” Breitner
  mail@joachim-breitner.dehttps://www.joachim-breitner.de/
  XMPP: nomeata@joachim-breitner.de • OpenPGP-Key: 0xF0FBF51F
  Debian Developer: nomeata@debian.org

_______________________________________________
ghc-steering-committee mailing list
ghc-steering-committee@haskell.org
https://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-steering-committee