I can't tell if SPJ's concerns were addressed by subsequent edits.

I'm general in favor of all things that make low-allocation, strict programming more practical.  So it is no surprise that this sounds like music to my ears, and thus I'm inclined to argue for "accept".

Best,
  -Ryan


On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 3:27 PM, Joachim Breitner <mail@joachim-breitner.de> wrote:
Dear Committee,

this is your secretary speaking:

Unlifted Newtypes were proposed
https://github.com/ghc-proposals/ghc-proposals/pull/98

I propose Richard Eisenberg as the Shepherd.

Richard, please reach consensus as described in
https://github.com/ghc-proposals/ghc-proposals#committee-process

I suggest you make a recommendation about the decision, maybe point out
debatable points, and assume that anyone who stays quiet agrees with
you.

Thanks,
Joachim
--
Joachim Breitner
  mail@joachim-breitner.de
  http://www.joachim-breitner.de/

_______________________________________________
ghc-steering-committee mailing list
ghc-steering-committee@haskell.org
https://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-steering-committee