Hi,

Am Mittwoch, den 24.06.2020, 11:57 +0100 schrieb Richard Eisenberg:
>  A. By having shepherds reach out to community members external to the committee who can share their expert opinion
>  B. By maintaining a list of constituencies that the committee membership covers (ideally)
>
> These can be combined, or we could do neither. (Right now, we do neither.)

I think we have sometimes used A. For example with the proposal about
Arrow something, we (or the author?) reached out the likely affected
library authors.

I am slightly favoring A (less formal, less process overhead, maybe
more flexible).

Cheers,
Joachim

--
Joachim Breitner
  mail@joachim-breitner.de
  http://www.joachim-breitner.de/


_______________________________________________
ghc-steering-committee mailing list
ghc-steering-committee@haskell.org
https://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-steering-committee