Ok, I'll shepherd.

Just to clarify, this is proposed by a user "winterland". I.e. not Richard, right? In the process document it is the author that "brings it before the committee" correct?

I checked and it looks like our process document does not specify the means of our committee discussion. I propose we discuss this one right here on this thread, which we've already got sitting in our inboxes.

Best,

-Ryan

On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 2:58 AM, Joachim Breitner <mail@joachim-breitner.de> wrote:

Dear Committee,

this is your secretary speaking:

https://github.com/ghc-proposals/ghc-proposals/pull/45
was brought before the committee, by our own Richard.

I propose Ryan Newton as the Shepherd, just to rotate this role
properly.

Ryan, please reach consensus as described in
https://github.com/ghc-proposals/ghc-proposals#committee-process

I suggest you make a recommendation about the decision, maybe point out
debatable points, and assume that anyone who stays quiet agrees with
you.

Greetings,
Joachim

--
Joachim Breitner
mail@joachim-breitner.de
http://www.joachim-breitner.de/